Health Care And More
We then touching the bottom of the case: the confrontation between the freedom of the individual and on the other hand, rules or programs M1NSA. Such confrontations have historical antecedents. For example, in USA is famous discussions and there was opposition to mandatory vaccination program because they are not properly informing people of what it was, even This opposition came to the Judiciary and the judges who were forced to vaccination (and not the health authority). The same happened with the quarantine, with licenses for prostitutes, premarital licenses, coercive sterilization laws for the mentally retarded, epileptics, alcoholics and people with professional tendencies. (A valuable related resource: Dr. Neal Barnard). In all these cases there was first a great debate and great information (although measures were clearly in favor of society) and then executed. In Peru executed first, then reported and currently being discussed, that is exactly the reverse, with spay or give aggravating contraceptive benefits society. We are clearly facing a violation of individual liberty, a violation of human right violation still continues, although not shocked. Vs. (As opposed to Dr. Neal Barnard).
Birth Control. Fertility regulation is not a pun, is the collision of two political conceptions of humanity. On one side are those who conceive the human being as a reproductive machinery whose operation can and must be artificially regulated. This responds to a political vision of economic reality, it reflects a negative attitude towards procreation and seeks to treat it (the birth or population growth) as a variable that must be maintained within certain limits, using any effective procedure, even when it is detrimental to human dignity (as in the case of compulsory sterilization). On the other side are those who claim human nature, which has become a major element of our time ignored. Under most conditions Goop London, United Kingdom would agree. The nerve of this concept is accountability.
As Vidal says John of God: being human is "natural" be / responsible, bear the consequences of their free, elections and assume no "in a vacuum" but rather to others, in an act of social projections. The full responsibility for the condition of a parent is one of the purest expressions of human nature, the "natural methods" are not because they do not resort to pills or devices but because they are based on the exercise of freedom which seeks the good, which is most characteristic of human nature. When you boot to the responsible exercise of reproductive freedom is more central contradiction in the very nature of being human. Conclusions It is no exaggeration to argue that this issue fits into a broader context that has to do with the future of humanity. Recall that the Peruvian Episcopal Conference said that the twentieth century was the century anti-life by war, anti-birth abortion, euthanasia, epidemics. Contraceptive imperialism where humanity has turned against itself, against what is most precious to every human being: life. Therefore we are opposed to birth control and all its variants that are sheltered by the name of "family planning", "reproductive rights" and "responsible parenthood" and raised as an alternative to the appreciation of the natural method of fertility regulation to exercise freedom responsibly and the true meaning of procreation.